What's on at Air Force Museum of New Zealand
Latest from the museum
Support
Home For Heroes


Birthday Parties
Mission: Best birthday ever
Exhibition
The Mighty Hercules


Update
Overseas visitor charge
Our Aircraft
Explore AircraftMore to explore
Support


Birthday Parties
Exhibition


Update
More to explore
REMEMBERING COLIN MARRIOTT, DFM: Margaret Austin, nee Marriott, dropped by to place a poppy next to the name of her uncle, Colin Marriott, who was killed when his Lancaster crashed on 12 May 1944.
Pilot Officer Marriott was only 20 years old and the captain of No. 626 Squadron Lancaster JB409/P2 when it took off just before midnight on 11 May for a raid on the Hasselt railway yards in Belgium.
Another Kiwi, navigator James Henry Barton, was aboard with five other crew.
A German night fighter tracked, attacked and shot down the Lancaster at 1am near
Krabbendijke, the Netherlands. The Lancaster hit a dike and exploded on impact, and no identifiable remains of the seven crew aboard could be recovered.
However, a battle-damaged axe was later recovered from the Lancaster and is on display in our Horizon to Horizon gallery.
Colin was born in Christchurch and was a laboratory technician at the Canterbury Seed Company before he headed away to war.
He’d completed 12 operations and earned the Distinguished Flying Medal before he was lost.
Flight Sergeant James Henry Barton was ā company clerk from Gore and was 21 years old when he died.
Margaret, who lives in North Canterbury, always makes a point of commemorating her uncle Colin when she calls in to our museum.
“We’ve got to remember them, we always remember them,’’ she says.
And she’s right.
#bombercommand #rsa ... See MoreSee Less
Comment on Facebook
CHARLES IN STEEL: Christchurch artist and engineer Michael Evenblij has immortalised our Lockheed C-130H Hercules NZ7001 in steel.
We knew our Hercules, affectionately known as Charles, was special, but this makes him even more special!
This one-off has a wingspan of 1m, is an extraordinarily heavy paperweight, and took Michael more hours than he cares to remember to craft out of 3mm thick steel.
It is definitely a one-off.
"I never ever want to make another one,'' he says.
It is for sale from our store. Email shop@airforcemuseum.co.nz for more details. ... See MoreSee Less
Comment on Facebook
It would look good if it was painted in the original colour of white and have the silver fern like thay were delivered in 1965
Ben Ellis halvsies?
Tania White my 60th is coming up 😉
3 mm steel ! Wow that is skills.
Nick de Lautour
Rob Tuttell
It looks amazing 👏
Wow awesome 😎 👌
Brilliant result Michael.. as an ex C130H pilot on 40 Sqn I admire greatly your skills to present this trophy... 👌👌👌
View more comments
URGENT CLARIFICATION: It has come to our attention that some people may have been lying awake at night, their minds riddled with confusion about the differences between Loadmasters and Bushmasters.
So we’re stepping in to clear up any doubt.
The confusion is understandable of course.
As well as having similar sounding names, Loadmasters and Bushmasters come in shades of green, are each brutishly strong and capable operators and they form integral parts of the modern defence force.
Some would say they are the chunky backbone of the NZDF.
But there are some subtle differences between these solid machines in green – not necessarily apparent at first to the untrained eye, which set these superstars apart.
So, we’ve prepared a handy three-step guide to help you tell our doppelgangers apart.
The first, and probably most noticeable difference, is that Loadmasters are strictly two-wheel drive while Bushmasters are four-wheel-drives. They can both operate comfortably at low speed in low ratios, and Loadmasters are particularly nimble going up stairs, where Bushmasters may struggle.
And while we are in the propulsion department, we should address the biggest difference – fuelling.
Loadmasters are fuelled via a top flap known as a ‘cake hole’ and accept almost any type of solid or liquid fuel, ranging from pies to higher octane liquids. Bushmasters run on diesel.
Which brings us to the final difference – and you will kick yourself once it is pointed out – range.
Bushmasters have a limited range of 800km, based on their 319-litre fuel capacity and need to fuel at least once every three days or so, depending on the mission.
Loadmasters have a much greater range, but require fuelling at least three times a day, and sometimes at more frequent intervals, depending on the mission.
So, there you have it, another clarification no one wanted or needed.
Never confuse your Bushmasters and Loadmasters again.
You’re welcome.
#urgentclarification #nzdf #rnzaf ... See MoreSee Less
Comment on Facebook
As an ex loadie “I approve this message “ 😆
You can spot the load master on any flight crew by their grey hair and well groomed moustache...
Thank you now I can sleep in peace knowing I'd rather be in a LAV
Believe the Load master has wings attached to shoulders don't think the other one has anything like that.🫠🍺
That old saying about learning something new every day? It's happened again.
This clarification of this very much confused mind is so very much appreciated. Thank you Raz and others at the Museum for this wonderful imparting of knowledge
My mind was thusly riddled so once again a timely clarification thank you!
So glad you clarified this though, big thanks for the indepth research and analysis.
Easy to see the confusion as they're almost the same shape & colour.
But the Bushie has the perfect combat record as no one has lost their lives while operating from a Bushie.
The Bushmaster has the ability to attach a large variety of mission specific kit. The load master has the ability to strap on an aircraft, which can assist with mission specific tasks.
Do you take requests? Hoping to see some clarification points between the Morris Major and the Gypsy Major. Still confusing after all these years.
Believe the brevet should have reflected BOTH! When front end were sipping martini's at the resort,there we were-hunkered down on the airfield utilising bushcraft skills to evade overnight predators and maintaining security of the aircraft and saving the taxpayer thousands in accomodation costs!
Perfect, thanks yet again. Phew... 🤣
Love these. Thanks again AFMNZ for a beautifully written piece of prose. As always said, these posts always brighten up my day.
Well well I've learnt something new cheers team Air Force Museum of New Zealand 😎
I haven't laughed so hard in a long time. Thank you to the author 👏👏👏
Brilliant 👏 clarification thankyou! 😁
Wonder no more! Thanks, AFMNZ!
what about the Police bushmasters differnt again
In the interests of "political correctness", and with my tongue planted firmly in my cheek, shouldn't these have been referred to as "Loadperson" and "Bushperson"?
Olivia Cook
I was totally confused until I reached the bottom and saw the pictures.
Brilliant!
Loadmasters / Bushrangers...... more similar than they are different. Big. Awkward. Demanding on resources. Smelly. Won't fit in the Herc.... impossible to trim if it did. AND don't even start me on the Bushmaster......
View more comments